Treat a changed value as new evidence
Synthetic remedy M-151 would change row R’s title from “Old” to “Corrected”. The customer subsequently changes it to “Customer choice”. The proposed correction was justified against Old; it does not establish that Customer choice is wrong. Pause M-151 and ask the correction owner to compare the new value with the intended outcome. A different row S remains Old and can continue under its own approved remedy.
| Target | Reviewed value | Current value | Remedy state |
|---|---|---|---|
| R / M-151 | Old | Customer choice | Recheck; do not overwrite |
| S / M-152 | Old | Old | Approved correction remains applicable |
| R after re-review | New outcome comparison pending | Customer choice | No assumed error |
Confirm the correction is still needed
- Locate reviewed target value
- Compare current customer value
- Reassess changed targets
- Apply only still-supported remedy
A record-wide snapshot may contain unrelated newer edits; do not replace it merely to achieve one field correction.
Does M-151 prove Customer choice should become Corrected?
Show the worked answer
No. It reviewed Old. The newer value needs a fresh outcome comparison; only S still matches its reviewed precondition.
Preserve the later customer value while reviewing its intended outcome. A remedy for the earlier value cannot establish that the new one is wrong.