Check the reservation’s latest business decision
The sample policy sends reservations to staff review at their cutoff; it does not release them automatically. At 14:00, RSV-Q has passed its 13:00 cutoff, but the order owner recorded a valid extension to 16:00 at 12:50. RSV-R expired at 13:00 with no extension and no physical pick. These times are synthetic local-clock inputs.
| Reservation | Original cutoff | Latest evidence | 14:00 decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSV-Q / 5 units | 13:00 | EXT-Q valid to 16:00 | Retain; use current cutoff |
| RSV-R / 2 units | 13:00 | No extension; unpicked | Owner authorises release REL-R |
| RSV-S / 1 unit | 13:00 | Handover state unresolved | Investigate; no release yet |
Release only the reviewed expiry case
- Queue records past listed cutoff
- Check valid extensions
- Check pick and handover state
- Owner retains or releases
- Record reason and next cutoff if retained
An unresolved handover remains a custody investigation, even when its reservation cutoff has passed.
The review produces two different outcomes: Q remains reserved and R releases two units. S stays unresolved. A batch action on the original 13:00 timestamps would mishandle both Q and S. Actual extension permissions and cutoff meaning must be supplied by the business.
How many of the listed eight units are released at 14:00?
Show the worked answer
Two under RSV-R. Five under Q remain reserved until its current 16:00 cutoff, and one under S remains unresolved.