Skip to content
Astera Technology

Review related purchase requests against one approval scope

Apply a stated aggregation rule instead of treating document splitting as new authority.

Prepare the purchasing decision

Synthetic policy groups requests for one confirmed demand D-A under a HKD 1,200 authorisation limit. R-A1 is HKD 700 and R-A2 HKD 600, both for D-A. R-A3 is HKD 300 for unrelated D-B and is evaluated separately. Group membership comes from confirmed demand identity, not merely the same supplier or day.

Synthetic purchasing decision record
RequestDemandHKD amountReview group
R-A1D-A700D-A grouped
R-A2D-A600D-A grouped
R-A3D-B300Separate D-B
Download editable CSV ↓

Complete the recorded outcome

  1. Establish which requests represent the same demand.
  2. Sum only that authorised group under the stated rule.
  3. Seek the correct scope approval rather than splitting release documents.

Unconfirmed relationships need clarification; do not aggregate all purchases from a supplier into one fictional project.

Does D-A fit the HKD 1,200 limit?

Show the worked answer

No. 700 + 600 = 1300, exceeding it by 100. D-B’s 300 is separate under this example rule.

This is an authored purchase-control policy, not a legal spending limit or a recommendation about real finances.

Related resources