Skip to content
Astera Technology

Compare a flexible design using conditional later effort

Show where paying more now can reduce modelled expected effort later.

Plan from the supplied facts

Fictional rigid design costs two hours now and eight extra if a later rule changes. Flexible design costs five now and one extra if it changes. Supplied change probability is 0.5, with no other costs or benefits. Compare expected total effort, not the cheapest unchanged outcome.

Editable original planning example
DesignNo change hChange hExpected h at p=.5
Rigid2106
Flexible565.5
DifferenceRigid 3 lessFlexible 4 lessFlexible .5 less
Download editable CSV ↓

Work through the choice

Expected totals are 2+0.5×8=6 and 5+0.5×1=5.5. A flexible design is not always lower effort: if no rule changes, it costs three more.

If the supplied change probability is zero, which design has lower effort?

Show the worked answer

Rigid at two hours versus flexible at five. The choice depends on the supplied uncertainty model.

Material to use in your plan

List initial effort, revision effort and the change probability for each design. Retain both conditional outcomes alongside the expected total and the reasons for the probability assumption.

Related resources