Record what was actually shown
The invented buyer asks for conflict prevention and linked data export. The sheet compares evidence types only; it does not rank real suppliers or claim the sample demonstration occurred.
| Claim | Illustrative supplied material | What it could establish | What remains open |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booking conflicts prevented | Brochure says “booking module” | A written feature assertion | Exact same-room conflict behaviour |
| Same-room request rejected | Recorded synthetic scenario in demo workspace | Behaviour visible in that supplied recording | Configuration, reproducibility and live setup |
| Linked export usable | Buyer can repeat synthetic export and check links | Reproduced task under stated trial conditions | Other volumes, formats and contractual inclusion |
Evidence type is not a readiness score
A recording shows one rejected duplicate. Does that prove every production conflict is prevented?
Show the worked answer
No. It supports only the displayed scenario in its setup. Ask for conditions and reproducible cases relevant to your requirement; retain the untested scope explicitly.
The register records evidence strength by description, not a scientific score or guarantee. A real observed result needs its actual run and supporting material.