Name the reviewer for each kind of decision
In this fictional release, Jo checks business facts, Mei edits zh-HK wording, Ren edits English wording and Kai approves publication after both page-context reviews. These assignments illustrate governance, not translation performance.
| Review stage | Owner | Evidence | Can approve publication? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facts in both locales | Jo | Same supported date, amount and eligibility | No; fact check only |
| Original zh-HK and English editing | Mei for zh-HK; Ren for EN | Natural copy and noted changes | No; editorial review only |
| Page-context approval | Kai after both reviewers | Buttons, errors and full pages reviewed in both locales | Yes under this fixture |
Editing and publishing are different authorities
Mei approves the Chinese wording in a spreadsheet, but the page buttons have not been reviewed. Can Kai mark both locales complete?
Show the worked answer
No. The fixture still needs page-context reviews in both locales. Preserve Mei’s wording approval and complete the missing stage before publication approval.
This sheet assigns review responsibility; it does not replace the native bilingual translation acceptance guide or claim a text has been reviewed. Write zh-HK independently and keep factual changes aligned.