Skip to content
Astera Technology

Bound the effort an investigation could possibly save

Compare investigation cost with a perfect-information upper bound.

Plan from the supplied facts

In the fictional model, a wrong design causes 12 extra hours with probability 0.25; otherwise no rework. An investigation costs 4 hours. Assume perfect information could prevent all of that rework and has no other benefit. This generous ceiling saves at most 0.25×12=3 expected hours.

Editable original planning example
Model itemValueMeaning
Rework chance × hours0.25 × 123 expected hours at risk
Perfect preventionAt most 3Upper bound before investigation
Investigation4 hoursNet ceiling −1 hour saved
Download editable CSV ↓

Work through the choice

If even perfect information cannot recover its effort cost in this isolated model, imperfect information cannot do better. Additional benefits would require explicit model expansion.

Can this four-hour investigation have a positive expected effort saving under the given assumptions?

Show the worked answer

No. Best possible net saving is 3−4=−1 hour. This conclusion concerns effort only, not unmodelled quality or consequence.

Material to use in your plan

List avoidable effort per scenario, probability, maximum prevention and investigation effort. Use the ceiling as a screening bound, then add other decision consequences explicitly.

Related resources