Map the instruction to current task uses
Synthetic instruction INST-C v2 is withdrawn because its field list is wrong. Task A has not started; B has processed three of six forms under v2; C uses unaffected v1. The owner directs A and B to pause until v3 is supplied. This is an internal execution instruction, not a public content-release approval.
| Task | Revision / progress | Action |
|---|---|---|
| A | v2 / not started | Hold start |
| B | v2 / 3 of 6 processed | Pause; review processed 3 |
| C | v1 / unaffected | Continue under v1 |
Retain work evidence while withdrawing the instruction
- Identify withdrawn v2
- Find A and B references
- Pause affected work
- Save B’s processed records
- Reassess under supplied v3
Do not label the three processed forms valid or invalid solely from withdrawal; compare the actual affected fields when corrected instructions arrive.
A and B are paused; C continues. B still has three processed and three untouched forms, with the processed subset awaiting a specific review. Deleting the progress would lose the evidence needed for repair.
Should C stop because another instruction revision was withdrawn?
Show the worked answer
No under these inputs: C uses unaffected v1. Stop only A and B, which use v2.